- Newsletters

The IRS has released the annual inflation adjustments for 2026 for the income tax rate tables, plus more than 60 other tax provisions. The IRS makes these cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) each year to reflect inflation.

2026 Income Tax Brackets

For 2026, the highest income tax bracket of 37 percent applies when taxable income hits:

$768,700 for married individuals filing jointly and surviving spouses,
$640,600 for single individuals and heads of households,
$384,350 for married individuals filing separately, and
$16,000 for estates and trusts.

2026 Standard Deduction

The standard deduction for 2026 is:

$32,200 for married individuals filing jointly and surviving spouses,
$24,150 for heads of households, and
$16,100 for single individuals and married individuals filing separately.

The standard deduction for a dependent is limited to the greater of:

$1,350 or
the sum of $450, plus the dependent’s earned income.

Individuals who are blind or at least 65 years old get an additional standard deduction of:

$1,650 for married taxpayers and surviving spouses, or
$2,050 for other taxpayers.

Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) Exemption for 2026

The AMT exemption for 2026 is:

$140,200 for married individuals filing jointly and surviving spouses,
$90,100 for single individuals and heads of households,
$70,100 for married individuals filing separately, and
$31,400 for estates and trusts.

The exemption amounts phase out in 2026 when AMTI exceeds:

$1,000,000 for married individuals filing jointly and surviving spouses,
$500,000 for single individuals, heads of households, and married individuals filing separately, and
$104,800 for estates and trusts.

Expensing Code Sec. 179 Property in 2026

For tax years beginning in 2026, taxpayers can expense up to $2,560,000 in section 179 property. However, this dollar limit is reduced when the cost of section 179 property placed in service during the year exceeds $4,090,000.

Estate and Gift Tax Adjustments for 2026

The following inflation adjustments apply to federal estate and gift taxes in 2026:

the gift tax exclusion is $19,000 per donee, or $194,000 for gifts to spouses who are not U.S. citizens;
the federal estate tax exclusion is $15,000,000; and
the maximum reduction for real property under the special valuation method is $1,460,000.

2026 Inflation Adjustments for Other Tax Items

The maximum foreign earned income exclusion amount in 2026 is $132,900.

The IRS also provided inflation-adjusted amounts for the:

adoption credit,
earned income credit,
excludable interest on U.S. savings bonds used for education,
various penalties, and
many other provisions.

Effective Date of 2026 Adjustments

These inflation adjustments generally apply to tax years beginning in 2026, so they affect most returns that will be filed in 2027. However, some specified figures apply to transactions or events in calendar year 2026.

Rev. Proc. 2025-32

IR-2025-103

Close

The IRS has released the 2025-2026 special per diem rates. Taxpayers use the per diem rates to substantiate certain expenses incurred while traveling away from home. These special per diem rates include:

the special transportation industry meal and incidental expenses (M&IE) rates,
the rate for the incidental expenses only deduction,
and the rates and list of high-cost localities for purposes of the high-low substantiation method.

Transportation Industry Special Per Diem Rates

The special M&IE rates for taxpayers in the transportation industry are:

$80 for any locality of travel in the continental United States (CONUS), and
$86 for any locality of travel outside the continental United States (OCONUS).

Incidental Expenses Only Rate

The rate is $5 per day for any CONUS or OCONUS travel for the incidental expenses only deduction.

High-Low Substantiation Method

For purposes of the high-low substantiation method, the 2025-2026 special per diem rates are:

$319 for travel to any high-cost locality, and
$225 for travel to any other locality within CONUS.

The amount treated as paid for meals is:

$86 for travel to any high-cost locality, and
$74 for travel to any other locality within CONUS

Instead of the meal and incidental expenses only substantiation method, taxpayers may use:

$86 for travel to any high-cost locality, and
$74 for travel to any other locality within CONUS.

Taxpayers using the high-low method must comply with Rev. Proc. 2019-48, I.R.B. 2019-51, 1392. That procedure provides the rules for using a per diem rate to substantiate the amount of ordinary and necessary business expenses paid or incurred while traveling away from home.

Notice 2024-68, I.R.B. 2024-41, 729 is superseded.

Notice 2025-54

Close

The IRS has issued transitional guidance for reporting certain interest payments received on specified passenger vehicle loans made in the course of a trade or business during calendar year 2025. The guidance applies to reporting obligations under new Code Sec. 6050AA, enacted as part of the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act (P.L. 119-21).

Under Code Sec. 163(h)(4), as amended, "qualified passenger vehicle loan interest" is deductible by an individual for tax years beginning in 2025 through 2028. Code Sec. 6050AA requires any person engaged in a trade or business who receives $600 or more in such interest from an individual in a calendar year to file an information return with the IRS and statements to the borrowers. The information return must include the borrower’s identifying information, the amount of interest paid, loan details, and vehicle information.

Recognizing that lenders may need additional time to update their systems and that the Service must design new reporting forms, the Treasury Department and the IRS have granted temporary relief. For calendar year 2025 only, recipients may satisfy their reporting obligations by providing a statement to each borrower by January 31, 2026, indicating the total amount of interest received in calendar year 2025 on a specified passenger vehicle loan. This information may be delivered electronically, through online portals, or via annual or monthly statements.

No penalties under Code Sec. 6721 or 6722 will be imposed for 2025 if recipients comply with this transitional reporting procedure. The notice is effective for interest received during calendar year 2025. The IRS estimates that approximately 35,800 respondents will issue about 8 million responses annually, with an average burden of 0.25 hours per response.

Notice 2025-57

IR 2025-105

Close

The IRS issued updates to frequently asked questions (FAQs) about Form 1099-K, Payment Card and Third-Party Network Transactions (Code Sec. 6050W). The updates reflect changes made under the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), which reinstated the prior reporting threshold for third-party settlement organizations (TPSOs) and provided clarifications on filing requirements, taxpayer responsibilities, and penalty relief provisions. The updates supersede those issued in FS-2024-03. More information is available here.

Form 1099-K Reporting Threshold

Under the OBBB, the reporting threshold for TPSOs has been restored to the pre-ARPA level, requiring a Form 1099-K to be issued only when the gross amount of payments exceeds $20,000 and the number of transactions exceeds 200. The lower $600 threshold established by the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) no longer applies. The IRS noted that while the federal threshold has increased, some states may impose lower thresholds, and TPSOs must comply with those state-level reporting requirements.

Taxpayer Guidance

The FAQs explain that a Form 1099-K reports payments received through payment cards (credit, debit, or stored-value cards) or payment apps and online marketplaces used for selling goods or providing services. All income remains taxable unless excluded by law, even if not reported on a Form 1099-K.

If a Form 1099-K is incorrect or issued in error, taxpayers should contact the filer listed on the form to request a correction. If a corrected form cannot be obtained in time, taxpayers may adjust the reporting on Schedule 1 (Form 1040) by offsetting the erroneous amount when filing their return.

New Clarifications and Examples

The updated FAQs include expanded examples to help taxpayers properly determine income and filing obligations:

Sales of personal items – How to determine taxable gain or nondeductible loss on items sold through online platforms?
Crowdfunding proceeds – When contributions are taxable income versus nontaxable gifts.
Backup withholding – How failure to provide a valid taxpayer identification number (TIN) can result in withholding under Code Sec. 3406?
Multiple Forms 1099-K – How to report combined or duplicate forms properly using Schedule 1 (Form 1040)?

Third-Party Filer Responsibilities

The FAQs reaffirm that merchant acquiring entities and TPSOs are responsible for preparing, filing, and furnishing Form 1099-K statements. There is no de minimis exception for payment-card transactions. Entities that submit payment instructions remain subject to penalties under Code Sec. 6721 and 6722 for failing to file or furnish correct information returns. TPSOs are not required to include Merchant Category Codes (MCCs), while merchant acquiring entities must do so where applicable.

Ticket Sales and Executive Order 14254

The updated FAQs also address Executive Order 14254, Combating Unfair Practices in the Live Entertainment Market, issued in March 2025. The IRS clarified that income from ticket sales and resales is includible in gross income and subject to reporting. Payment settlement entities facilitating these sales must issue Form 1099-K when federal thresholds are met, and non-PSE payors may be required to issue Form 1099-MISC or Form 1099-NEC for payments of $2,000 or more made after December 31, 2025.

Reliance and Penalty Relief

Although the FAQs are not published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (IRB) and cannot be used as legal precedent, the IRS confirmed that taxpayers who reasonably and in good faith rely on them will not be subject to penalties that allow for a reasonable-cause standard, including negligence or accuracy-related penalties, if such reliance results in an underpayment of tax.

FS-2025-8

IR-2025-107

Close

For 2026, the Social Security wage cap will be $184,500, and Social Security and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits will increase by 2.8 percent. These changes reflect cost-of-living adjustments to account for inflation.

Wage Cap for Social Security Tax

The Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) tax on wages is 7.65 percent each for the employee and the employer. FICA tax has two components:

a 6.2 percent social security tax, also known as old age, survivors, and disability insurance (OASDI); and
a 1.45 percent Medicare tax, also known as hospital insurance (HI).

For self-employed workers, the Self-Employment tax is 15.3 percent, consisting of:

a 12.4 percent OASDI tax; and
a 2.9 percent HI tax.

OASDI tax applies only up to a wage base, which includes most wages and self-employment income up to the annual wage cap.

For 2026, the wage base is $184,500. Thus, OASDI tax applies only to the taxpayer’s first $184,500 in wages or net earnings from self-employment. Taxpayers do not pay any OASDI tax on earnings that exceed $184,500.

There is no wage cap for HI tax.

Maximum Social Security Tax for 2026

For workers who earn $184,500 or more in 2026:

an employee will pay a total of $11,439 in social security tax ($184,500 x 6.2 percent);
the employer will pay the same amount; and
a self-employed worker will pay a total of $22,878 in social security tax ($184,500 x 12.4 percent).

Additional Medicare Tax

Higher-income workers may have to pay an Additional Medicare tax of 0.9 percent. This tax applies to wages and self-employment income that exceed:

$250,000 for married taxpayers who file a joint return;
$125,000 for married taxpayers who file separate returns; and
$200,000 for other taxpayers.

The annual wage cap does not affect the Additional Medicare tax.

Benefit Increase for 2026

Finally, a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) will increase social security and SSI benefits for 2026 by 2.8 percent. The COLA is intended to ensure that inflation does not erode the purchasing power of these benefits.

Social Security Fact Sheet: 2026 Social Security Changes

SSA Press Release: Social Security Announces 2.8 Percent Benefit Increase for 2026

Close

The IRS issued frequently asked questions (FAQs) addressing the limitation on Employee Retention Credit (ERC) claims for the third and fourth quarters of 2021 under the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). The FAQs clarify when such claims are disallowed and how the IRS will handle related filings.

Limitation on Late Claims

ERC claims filed after January 31, 2024, for the third and fourth quarters of 2021 will not be allowed or refunded after July 4, 2025, under section 70605(d) of the OBBBA.

Previously Refunded Claims

Claims filed after January 31, 2024, that were refunded or credited before July 4, 2025, are not affected by this limitation. Other IRS compliance reviews, however, may still apply.

Withdrawn Claims

An amended return withdrawing a previously claimed ERC after January 31, 2024, is not subject to section 70605(d). The IRS will process such amended returns.

Filing Date

An ERC claim is considered filed on or before January 31, 2024, if the return was postmarked or electronically submitted by that date.

Processing of Other Items

If an ERC claim is disallowed under section 70605(d), the IRS may still process other items on the same return.

Appeals Rights

Taxpayers whose ERC claims are disallowed will receive Letter 105-C (Claim Disallowed) and may appeal to the IRS Independent Office of Appeals if they believe the claim was timely filed.

FS-2025-7

IR-2025-106

Close

The IRS identified drought-stricken areas where tax relief is available to taxpayers that sold or exchanged livestock because of drought. The relief extends the deadlines for taxpayers to replace the livestock and avoid reporting gain on the sales. These extensions apply until the drought-stricken area has a drought-free year.

When Sales of Livestock are Involuntary Conversions

Sales of livestock due to drought are involuntary conversions of property. Taxpayers can postpone gain on involuntary conversions if they buy qualified replacement property during the replacement period. Qualified replacement property must be similar or related in service or use to the converted property.

Usually, the replacement period ends two years after the tax year in which the involuntary conversion occurs. However, a longer replacement period applies in several situations, such as when sales occur in a drought-stricken area.

Livestock Sold Because of Weather

Taxpayers have four years to replace livestock they sold or exchanged solely because of drought, flood, or other weather condition. Three conditions apply.

First, the livestock cannot be raised for slaughter, held for sporting purposes or be poultry.

Second, the taxpayer must have held the converted livestock for:

draft,
dairy, or
breeding purposes.

Third, the weather condition must make the area eligible for federal assistance.

Persistent Drought

The IRS extends the four-year replacement period when a taxpayer sells or exchanges livestock due to persistent drought. The extension continues until the taxpayer’s region experiences a drought-free year.

The first drought-free year is the first 12-month period that:

ends on August 31 in or after the last year of the four-year replacement period, and
does not include any weekly period of drought.

What Areas are Suffering from Drought

The National Drought Mitigation Center produces weekly Drought Monitor maps that report drought-stricken areas. Taxpayers can view these maps at

https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/Maps/MapArchive.aspx.

However, the IRS also provided a list of areas where the year ending on August 31, 2025, was not a drought-free year. The replacement period in these areas will continue until the area has a drought-free year.

Notice 2025-52

IR-2025-93

Close

The IRS and Treasury have issued final regulations setting forth recordkeeping and reporting requirements for the average income test for purposes of the low-income housing credit. The regulations adopt the proposed and temporary regulations issued in 2022 with only minor, non-substantive changes.

Low-Income Housing Credit

An owner of a newly constructed or substantially rehabilitated qualified low-income building in a qualified low-income housing project may be eligible for the low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC) under Code Sec. 42. A project qualifies as a low-income housing project it satisfies certain set-aside tests or alternatively an average income test.

Under the average income test, at least 40 percent (25 percent in New York City) of a qualified group of residential units must be both rent-restricted and occupied by low-income individuals. Also, the average of the imputed income limitations must not exceed 60 percent of the area median gross income (AMGI).

Recording Keeping and Reporting Requirements

The regulations provide procedures for a taxpayer to identify a qualified group of residential units that satisfy the average income test. This includes recording the identification in the taxpayer’s books and records, including a change in a unit’s imputed income limit. The taxpayer also must communicate the annual identification to the applicable housing agency.

The final regulations clarify the submission of a corrected qualified group when the taxpayer or housing agency realizes that a previously submitted group fails to be a qualified group. The housing agency is also allowed the discretion to permit a taxpayer to submit one or two lists qualified groups of low-income units to demonstrate compliance with the minimum set-aside test and the applicable fractions for the building.

(T.D. 10036)

Close

A new, 10 percent middle-income tax cut is conditionally expected to be advanced in 2019, according to the House’s top tax writer. This timeline, although largely already expected on Capitol Hill, departs sharply from President Donald Trump’s original prediction that the measure would surface by November.

Middle-Income Tax Cut

President Donald Trump announced on October 22 that a new 10 percent tax cut would soon be unveiled that will focus specifically on middle-income taxpayers. "President Trump is determined to provide further tax relief for middle-class families," House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady, R-Tex., said in an October 23 statement. "We will continue to work with the White House and Treasury over the coming weeks to develop an additional 10 percent tax cut focused specifically on middle-class families and workers, to be advanced as Republicans retain the House and Senate," Brady added.

Comment. Notably, Brady is essentially highlighting in his statement that any such additional tax cut measure would require a Republican majority for congressional approval. As November midterm elections near, there is "talk" on Capitol Hill that Republicans may lose control of the House.

The additional 10 percent tax cut for middle-income taxpayers would aim to build upon the individual tax cuts enacted last December under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97). To that end, the House passed a "Tax Reform 2.0"package last month, which would make permanent the TCJA’s individual and small business tax credits. The TCJA’s individual tax cut provisions were enacted temporarily through 2025 in accordance with certain Senate budget rules. Although the TCJA did not receive one Democratic vote, the Tax Reform 2.0 package did clear the House with some bipartisan support.

New Congress, New Tax Cut

"We expect to advance this in the new session of Congress if Republicans maintain control of the House and Senate," Brady, said of the tax cut in an October 26 televised interview. However, President Trump said a couple of days before that a " resolution" would be introduced for the tax cut by the week of October 29.

Democratic lawmakers have been criticizing Trump’s announcement as nothing more than politically-driven rhetoric ahead of the November 6 midterm elections. Several top congressional Democrats have voiced intent to repeal, at least in part, the TCJA enacted last December. While Republicans, on the other hand, want to continue building upon the TCJA’s tax cuts.

"What President Trump is looking at is a 10 percent cut focused on middle-class workers and families…he still believes middle-class families are the ones always in the squeeze," Brady said on October 26. "We’ve been working with the White House and the Treasury on some ideas about how best to do it," he added.

Net Neutral

Trump has predicted that the tax cut will be net neutral. A chief complaint of last year’s tax reform among Democrats is the TCJA estimated $1.4 trillion price tag over a 10-year budget window.

"If you speak to Brady and a group of people, we're putting in a tax reduction of 10 percent, which I think will be a net neutral because we're doing other things, which I don't have to explain now," Trump said. A spokesperson for Brady has reportedly said that cost measures for the tax cut will be addressed once the proposal has been scored.

Looking Ahead

At this time, it is considered likely on Capitol Hill that Republicans will retain control of the Senate, but several predictions continue to float that the GOP will lose its House majority. Republicans would likely need to retain control of both chambers for any chance of approving further individual tax cuts or making permanent those enacted under the TCJA.

Although, the House approved its "Tax Reform 2.0" package last month, which includes measures to make permanent the TCJA’s individual tax cuts and enhance various savings accounts and business innovation, the Senate has showed little interest in taking up the package as a whole before the end of the year. However, consideration of the retirement and savings measure in the lame-duck session remains a possibility.

Close

The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and the American Bar Association (ABA) Section of Taxation are urging the IRS to make extensive changes to proposed "transition tax" rules.

Transition Tax

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97), enacted last December, revived and amended Code Sec. 965. The new Code Sec. 965 generally requires U.S. shareholders pay a mandatory one-time repatriation "transition" tax on untaxed foreign earnings of certain foreign corporations.

"The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act treats these foreign earnings as repatriated and places a 15.5 percent tax on cash or cash equivalents, and an 8 percent tax on the remaining earnings. Generally, the transition tax can be paid in installments over an eight-year period when a taxpayer files a timely election under section 965(h),"Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said in a statement.

The IRS held an October 22 public hearing on NPRM REG-104226-18, which provides rules for implementing the transition tax created under last year’s tax reform. IRS officials did not provide any feedback at the hearing.

AICPA Recommendations

In an October 31 comment letter to the IRS, the AICPA offered 15 recommendations to provide taxpayers further clarity and guidance on tax reform’s transition tax requirements. The AICPA’s recommendations include the following:

Clarify that previously taxed earnings (PTI) under Code Sec. 965(b)(4)(A) are deemed included in Code Sec. 951 for purposes of applying Code Sec. 1248(d).
Clarify that the portion of a Code Sec. 965 inclusion liability attributable to Code Sec. 956 is eligible for the appropriate reduced rate of tax as a consequence of the deduction provided for in Code Sec. 965(c).
Provide taxpayers with additional flexibility when making the basis adjustment election under Proposed Reg. §1.965-2(f) by including the ability to make partial basis adjustments, elect adjustments on an entity-by-entity basis, and modify the proposed consistency provision on related persons.
Provide guidance as to the ordering of distributions of PTI between Code Sec. 965(a) PTI and Code Sec. 965(b) PTI for purposes of applying Code Sec. 959(c) and Code Sec. 986(c).
Provide relief to taxpayers that make or have made late elections under the proposed regulations and clarify the procedure for obtaining such relief.
Provide that U.S. shareholders that are members of the same consolidated group are treated as a single U.S. shareholder for all purposes with respect to Code Sec. 965.
Clarify that the PTI amount created under Code Sec. 965(b)(4)(A) is not taken into account under Code Sec. 864(e)(4)(D) for purposes of allocating and apportioning interest expense.
Exercise the authority under Code Sec. 965(o) to provide relief from the income inclusion to certain affected taxpayers. Specifically, provide guidance excluding a foreign corporation that is considered a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) solely as a result of the "downward attribution" rules of Code Sec. 318(a)(3) from the definition of an specified foreign corporation (SFC) for any U.S. shareholder not considered a related party (within the meaning of Code Sec. 954(d)(3)) with respect to the domestic corporation to which ownership was attributed.
Provide a carve-out for certain "triggering events" of an S corporation Code Sec. 965(i), such as where the S corporation and relevant shareholders maintain direct or indirect ownership of the transferred assets (e.g., tax-free transfers).
Provide guidance on the interaction between a Code Sec. 962 election and a Code Sec. 965(i) election, including clarifying that an eligible taxpayer may make a Code Sec. 962 election for a Code Sec. 965 tax liability for which they intend to defer inclusion under Code Sec. 965(i).

ABA Recommendations

Likewise, the ABA made similar recommendations on the proposed regulations and related guidance in an October 29 letter sent to IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig. The ABA’s 80-page letter grouped its principal recommendations into the three categories:

the application of Code Sec. 965 to passthrough entities (other than S corporations) and individuals;
the application of the netting of accumulated post-1986 deferred foreign income with deficits in other related entities; and
issues in applying the foreign tax credit.

Close

Last year’s Tax Reform created a new 20-percent deduction of qualified business income for passthrough entities, subject to certain limitations. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97) created the new Code Sec. 199A passthrough deduction for noncorporate taxpayers, effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. However, the provision was enacted only temporarily through 2025. The controversial deduction has remained a buzzing topic of debate among lawmakers, tax policy experts, and stakeholders. In addition to its impermanence, the new passthrough deduction’s ambiguous statutory language has created many questions for taxpayers and practitioners.

The IRS released the much-anticipated proposed regulations on the new passthrough deduction, REG-107892-18, on August 8. The guidance has generated a mixed reaction on Capitol Hill, and while significant questions may have been answered, it appears that many remain. Indeed, an IRS spokesperson told Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting before the regulations were released that the IRS’s goal was to issue complete regulations but that the guidance "would not cover every question that taxpayers have."

Wolters Kluwer recently spoke with Joshua Wu, member, Clark Hill PLC, about the tax implications of the new passthrough deduction and proposed regulations. That exchange included a discussion of the impact that the new law and IRS guidance, both present and future, may have on taxpayers and tax practitioners.

I. Qualified Business Income and Activities

Wolters Kluwer: What is the effect of the proposed regulations requiring that qualified business activities meet the Code Sec. 162 trade or business standard? And for what industries might this be problematic?

Joshua Wu: The positive aspect of incorporating the Section 162 trade or business standard is that there is an established body of case law and administrative guidance with respect to what activities qualify as a trade or business. However, the test under Section 162 is factually-specific and requires an analysis of each situation. Sometimes courts reach different results with respect to activities constituting a trade or business. For example, gamblers have been denied trade or business status in numerous cases. In Groetzinger, 87-1 ustc ¶9191, 480 U.S. 23 (1987), the Court held that whether professional gambling is a trade or business depends on whether the taxpayer can show he pursued gambling full-time, in good faith, regularly and continuously, and possessed a sincere profit motive. Some courts have held that the gambling activity must be full-time, from 60 to 80 hours per week, while others have questioned whether the full-time inquiry is a mandatory prerequisite or permissive factor to determine whether the taxpayer’s gambling activity is a trade or business. See e.g., Tschetschot , 93 TCM 914, Dec. 56,840(M)(2007). Although Section 162 provides a built-in body of law, plenty of questions remain.

Aside from the gambling industry, the real estate industry will continue to face some uncertainty over what constitutes a trade or business under Code Secs. 162 and 199A. The proposed regulations provide a helpful rule, where the rental or licensing of tangible or intangible property to a related trade or business is treated as a trade or business if the rental or licensing and the other trade or business are commonly controlled. But, that rule does not help taxpayers in the rental industry with no ties to another trade or business. The question remains whether a taxpayer renting out a single-family home or a small group of apartments is engaged in a trade or business for purposes of Code Secs. 162 and 199A. Some case law indicates that just receiving rent with nothing more may not constitute a trade or business. On the other hand, numerous cases have found that managing property and collecting rent can constitute a trade or business. Given the potential tax savings at issue, I suspect there will be additional cases in the real estate industry regarding the level of activity required for the leasing of property to be considered a trade or business.

Qualified Business Income

Wolters Kluwer: How does the IRS define qualified business income (QBI)?

Joshua Wu: QBI is the net amount of effectively connected qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss from any qualified trade or business. Certain items are excluded from QBI, such as capital gains/losses, certain dividends, and interest income. Proposed Reg. §1.199A-3(b) provides further clarity on QBI. Most importantly, they provide that a passthrough with multiple trades or businesses must allocate items of QBI to such trades or businesses based on a reasonable and consistent method that clearly reflects income and expenses. The passthrough may use a different reasonable method for different items of income, gain, deduction, and loss, but the overall combination of methods must also be reasonable based on all facts and circumstances. Further, the books and records must be consistent with allocations under the method chosen. The proposed regulations provide no specific guidance or examples of what a reasonable allocation looks like. Thus, taxpayers are left to determine what constitutes a reasonable allocation.

Unadjusted Basis Immediately after Acquisition

Wolters Kluwer: What effect does the unadjusted basis immediately after acquisition (UBIA) of qualified property attributable to a trade or business have on determining QBI?

Joshua Wu: For taxpayers above the taxable income threshold amounts, $157,500 (single or married filing separate) or $315,000 (married filing jointly), the Code limits the taxpayer’s 199A deduction based on (i) the amount of W-2 wages paid with respect to the trade or business, and/or (ii) the unadjusted basis immediately after acquisition (UBIA) of qualified property held for use in the trade or business.

Where a business pays little or no wages, and the taxpayer is above the income thresholds, the best way to maximize the deduction is to look to the UBIA of qualified property. Rather than the 50 percent of W-2 wages limitation, Section 199A provides an alternative limit based on 25 percent of W-2 wages and 2.5 percent of UBIA qualified property. The Code and proposed regulations define UBIA qualified property as tangible, depreciable property which is held by and available for use in the qualified trade or business at the close of the tax year, which is used at any point during the tax year in the production of qualified business income, and the depreciable period for which has not ended before the close of the tax year. The proposed regulations helpfully clarify that UBIA is not reduced for taxpayers who take advantage of the expanded bonus depreciation allowance or any Section 179expensing.

De Minimis Exception

Wolters Kluwer: How is the specified service trade or business (SSTB) limitation clarified under the proposed regulations? And how does the de minimis exception apply?

Joshua Wu: The proposed regulations provide helpful guidance on the definition of a SSTB and avoid what some practitioners feared would be an expansive and amorphous area of section 199A. Under the statute, if a trade or business is an SSTB, its items are not taken into account for the 199A computation. Thus, the performance of services in the fields of health, law, accounting, actuarial science, performing arts, consulting, athletics, financial and brokerage services, investment management, trading, dealing in securities, and any trade or business where the principal asset of such is the reputation or skill of one or more of its employees or owners, do not result in a 199A deduction.

There is a de minimis exception to the general rule for taxpayers with taxable income of less than $157,500 (single or married filing separate) or $315,000 (married filing jointly). Once those thresholds are hit, the 199A deduction phases-out until it is fully eliminated at $207,500 (single) or $415,000 (joint).

The proposed regulations provide guidance for each of the SSTB fields. Importantly, they also limit the "reputation or skill" category. The proposed regulations state that the "reputation or skill" clause was intended to describe a "narrow set of trades or businesses, not otherwise covered by the enumerated specified services." Thus, the proposed regulations limit this definition to cases where the business receives income from endorsing products or services, licensing or receiving income for use of an individual’s image, likeness, name, signature, voice, trademark, etc., or receiving appearance fees. This narrow definition is unlikely to impact most taxpayers.

Close