The Treasury Department and the IRS have proposed regulations that identify occupations that customarily and regularly receive tips, and define "qualified tips" that eligible tip recipients may claim for the "no tax on tips" deduction under Code Sec. 224. This deduction was enacted as part of the the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) (P.L. 119-21).

The Treasury Department and the IRS have proposed regulations that identify occupations that customarily and regularly receive tips, and define "qualified tips" that eligible tip recipients may claim for the "no tax on tips" deduction under Code Sec. 224. This deduction was enacted as part of the the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) (P.L. 119-21).

Background

Under Code Sec. 224, an eligible individual can claim an income tax deduction for qualified tips received in tax years 2025 through 2028. The deduction is limited to $25,000 per tax year, and starts to phase out when modified adjusted gross income is above $150,000 ($300,000 for joint filers).

An employer must report qualified tips on an employee‘s Form W-2, or the employee must report the tips on Form 4137. A service recipient must report qualified tips on an information return furnished to a nonemployee payee (Form 1099-NEC, Form 1099-MISC, Form 1099-K).

If an individual tip recipient is "married" (under Code Sec. 7703), the deduction applies only if the individual and his or her spouse file a joint return. The deduction is not allowed unless the taxpayer includes his or her social security number (SSN) on their income tax return for the tax year. For this purpose, a SSN is valid only if it is issued to a U.S. citizen or a person authorized to work in the United States, and before the due date of the taxpayer’s return.

What is a Qualified Tip?

A "qualified tip" is a cash tip received in an occupation that customarily and regularly received tips on or before December 31, 2024. An amount is not a qualified tip unless (1) the amount received is paid voluntarily without any consequence for nonpayment, is not the subject of negotiation, and is determined by the payor; (2) the trade or business in which the individual receives the amount is not a specified service trade or business under Code Sec. 199A(d)(2); and (3) other requirements established in regulations or other guidance are satisfied.

The proposed regulations define qualified tips—and payments that are not qualified tips— based on several factors, including the following:

• Qualified tips must be paid in cash or an equivalent medium, such as check, credit card, debit card, gift card, tangible or intangible tokens that are readily exchangeable for a fixed amount in cash, or another form of electronic settlement or mobile payment application that is denominated in cash.

• Qualified tips do not include items paid in any medium other than cash, such as event tickets, meals, services, or other assets that are not exchangeable for a fixed amount in cash (such as most digital assets).

• Qualified tips must be received from customers. For employees, qualified tips can be received through a mandatory or voluntary tip-sharing arrangement, such as a tip pool.

• Qualified tips must be paid voluntarily by the customer, and not be subject to negotiation.

• Qualified tips do not include some service charges. For example, if a restaurant imposes an automatic 18-percent service charge for large parties and distributes that amount to waiters, bussers and kitchen staff, the amounts distributed are not qualified tips if the charge is added with no option for the customer to disregard or modify it.

• Qualified tips do not include amounts received for an illegal activity (a service the performance of which is a felony or misdemeanor under applicable law), prostitution services, or pornographic activity.

• Qualified tips do not include tips received by an employee or other service provider who has an ownership interest in or is employed by the tip payor.

The proposed regulations also include examples that illustrate some of the requirements and restrictions.

Occupations that Customarily and Regularly Receive Tips

The proposed regulations list the occupations that customarily and regularly received tips on or before December 31, 2024. For each occupation, the list provides a numeric Treasury Tipped Occupation Code (TTOC), an occupation title, a description of the types of services performed in the occupation, illustrative examples of specific occupations, and the related Standard Occupation Classification (SOC) system code(s) published by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

The list groups the eligible occupations into eight categories:

• Beverage and Food Service—includes bartenders; wait staff; food servers outside of a restaurant; dining room and cafeteria attendants and bartender helpers; chefs and cooks; food preparation workers; fast food and counter workers; dishwashers; host staff, restaurant, lounge, and coffee shop; bakers

• Entertainment and Events—includes gambling dealers; gambling change persons and booth cashiers; gambling cage workers; gambling and sports book writers and runners; dancers; musicians and singers; disc jockeys (but not radio disc jockeys); entertainers and performers; digital content creators; ushers, lobby attendants, and ticket takers; locker room, coatroom, and dressing room attendants

• Hospitality and Guest Services—includes baggage porters and bellhops; concierges; hotel, motel, and resort desk clerks; maids and housekeeping cleaners

• Home Services—includes home maintenance and repair workers; home landscaping and groundskeeping workers; home electricians; home plumbers; home heating and air conditioning mechanics and installers; home appliance installers and repairers; home cleaning service workers; locksmiths; roadside assistance workers

• Personal Services—includes personal care and service workers; private event planners; private event and portrait photographers; private event videographers; event officiants; pet caretakers; tutors; nannies and babysitters

• Personal Appearance and Wellness—includes skincare specialists; massage therapists; barbers, hairdressers , hairstylists, and cosmetologists; shampooers; manicurists and pedicurists; eyebrow threading and waxing technicians; makeup artists; exercise trainers and group fitness instructors; tattoo artists and piercers; tailors; shoe and leather workers and repairers

• Recreation and Instruction—includes golf caddies; self-enrichment teachers; recreational and tour pilots; tour guides; travel guides; sports and recreation instructors

• Transportation and Delivery—includes parking and valet attendants; taxi and rideshare drivers and chauffeurs; shuttle drivers; goods delivery people; personal vehicle and equipment cleaners; private and charter bus drivers; water taxi operators and charter boat workers; rickshaw, pedicab, and carriage drivers; home movers

Applicability Dates

The proposed regulations apply for tax years beginning after December 31, 2024. Taxpayers may rely on the proposed regulations for those tax years, and on or before the date the final regulations are published in the Federal Register, but only if the proposed regulations are followed in their entirety and in a consistent manner.

Request for Comments, Public Hearing

Written or electronic comments must be received by October 22, 2025 (30 days after the proposed regulations are published in the Federal Register). Comments may be submitted electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal (https://www.regulations.gov), or on paper submitted to: CC:PA:01:PR (REG-110032-25), Room 5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044.

A public hearing is being held on October 23, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time (ET). Requests to speak and outlines of topics to be discussed at the public hearing must be received by October 22, 2025; if no outlines are received by that date, the public hearing will be cancelled. Requests to attend the public hearing must be received by 5:00 p.m. ET on October 21, 2023.

Proposed Regulations, NPRM REG-110032-25

The IRS issued final regulations implementing the Roth catch-up contribution requirement and other statutory changes to catch-up contributions made by the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-328). The regulations affect qualified retirement plans that allow catch-up contributions (including 401(k) plans, 403(b) plans, governmental plans, SEPs and SIMPLE plans) and their participants. The regulations generally apply for contribtions in tax years beginning after December 31, 2026, with extensions for collectively bargained, multiemployer, and governmental plans. However, plans may elect to apply the final rules in earlier tax years.

The IRS issued final regulations implementing the Roth catch-up contribution requirement and other statutory changes to catch-up contributions made by the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 (P.L. 117-328). The regulations affect qualified retirement plans that allow catch-up contributions (including 401(k) plans, 403(b) plans, governmental plans, SEPs and SIMPLE plans) and their participants. The regulations generally apply for contribtions in tax years beginning after December 31, 2026, with extensions for collectively bargained, multiemployer, and governmental plans. However, plans may elect to apply the final rules in earlier tax years.

The SECURE 2.0 Act amended the catch-up contribution provision to allow an increased contribution limit for participants aged 60 through 63 and an increased contribution limit for certain SIMPLE plans. The final regulations provide that SIMPLE plans may allow participant to take advantage of one of these increased contribution limits, but not both. However, beginning with the 2025 calendar year, a SIMPLE plan that provides for increased contribution limits for all participants may instead permit participants attaining age 60 to 63 to contribute the full amount allowed for that age group.

With respect to mandatory Roth catch-up contributions for particpants whose income exceeds a statutory threshold, the final regulations allow 401(k) and 403(b) plans to automatically treat catch-up contributions as Roth for affected participants, provided an opt-out opportunity is offered. The final regulations do not include a rule allowing deemed Roth elections for all employees' catch-up contributions, only for those employees whose income exceeds the threshold. In response to comments, the final regulations provide that deemed elections must cease within a reasonable period of time following the date on which the employee no longer meets the mandatory Roth threshold or an amended Form W-2 is filed or furnished to the employee indicating that the employee no longer meets the mandatory Roth threshold. As a result, Roth catch-up contributions made pursuant to the deemed election before the end of the reasonable period of time need not be recharacterized as pre-tax catch-up contributions. The IRS further indicated that the plan must be amended to implement deemed Roth elections, and that the deadline for adopting amendments implementing the SECURE 2.0 Act is generally December 31, 2026.

The final regulations provide two correction methods to address pre-tax contributions that should have been designated Roth. First, a plan may transfer pre-tax contributions to the participant's Roth account and report the contribution as an elective deferral that is a designated Roth contribution on the participant's Form W-2. This correction method is available only if the participant's Form W-2 for that year has not yet been filed or furnished to the participant. Alternatively, the plan can directly roll over the elective deferrals that would be catch-up contributions if they had been designated Roth contributions (adjusted for earnings and losses) from the participant’s pre-tax account to the participant’s designated Roth account and report the rollover on Form 1099-R. Failures do not need to be corrected if the amount of the pre-tax elective deferral that was required to be a designated Roth contribution does not exceed $250, or if the participant was incorrectly treated as subject to the Roth catch-up contribution requirement due to a Form W-2 that is later amended.

T.D. 10033

IR-2025-91

Revenue Procedure 2025-28 instructs taxpayers on how to make various elections, file amended returns or change accounting methods for research or experimental expenditures as provided under the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (P.L. 119-21). The revenue procedure also provides transitional rules, modifies Rev. Proc. 2025-23, and grants an extension of time for partnerships, S corporations, C corporations, individuals, estates and trusts, and exempt organizations to file superseding 2024 federal income tax returns.

Revenue Procedure 2025-28 instructs taxpayers on how to make various elections, file amended returns or change accounting methods for research or experimental expenditures as provided under the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (P.L. 119-21). The revenue procedure also provides transitional rules, modifies Rev. Proc. 2025-23, and grants an extension of time for partnerships, S corporations, C corporations, individuals, estates and trusts, and exempt organizations to file superseding 2024 federal income tax returns.

Background

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) required taxpayers to capitalize and amortize specified research or experimental expenditures over 5 years for domestic research or 15 years for foreign research, beginning with taxable years after December 31, 2021. The OBBB Act, enacted July 4, significantly modified these rules by adding new Code Sec. 174A to allow immediate deduction of domestic research or experimental expenditures while retaining the capitalization and amortization requirements only for foreign research expenditures.

Code Sec. 174A provides that domestic research or experimental expenditures paid or incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024, are generally deductible when paid or incurred. Alternatively, taxpayers may elect under Code Sec. 174A(c) to capitalize these expenditures and amortize them over at least 60 months, beginning when the taxpayer first realizes benefits from the expenditures.

The OBBB Act also provides transition relief, including retroactive application options for small business taxpayers and methods for recovering previously capitalized amounts.

Code Sec. 280C(c)(2) Elections and Revocations

Eligible small business taxpayers may make late elections under Code Sec. 280C(c)(2) to reduce their research credit in lieu of reducing their deductible research expenditures or revoke prior Code Sec. 280C(c)(2) elections. These are available for applicable taxable years where the original return was filed before September 15, 2025.

Elections are made by adjusting the research credit amount on amended returns, attaching amended Form 6765 marked with the appropriate revenue procedure reference, and including required declarations.

Code Sec. 174A(c) Election Procedures

For domestic research or experimental expenditures paid or incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024, taxpayers may elect to capitalize and amortize these expenditures under Code Sec. 174A(c). The election must be made by the due date of the return for the first applicable taxable year by attaching a statement specifying the amortization period (not less than 60 months) and the month when benefits are first realized.

Automatic Consent for Accounting Method Changes

Rev. Proc. 2025-28 modifies Rev. Proc. 2025-23 to provide automatic consent procedures for various accounting method changes related to research expenditures:

changes to comply with Code Sec. 174 for expenditures paid or incurred before January 1, 2025;

changes to implement the new Code Sec. 174A deduction or amortization methods for expenditures paid or incurred after December 31, 2024; and

changes to comply with modified Code Sec. 174 requirements for foreign research expenditures.

For the first taxable year beginning after December 31, 2024, taxpayers may use statements in lieu of Form 3115 for certain accounting method changes, with simplified procedures and waived duplicate filing requirements.

Small Business Retroactive Election

Small business taxpayers meeting the Code Sec. 448(c) gross receipts test (average annual gross receipts of $31,000,000 or less for 2025) may elect to retroactively apply Code Sec. 174A to domestic research or experimental expenditures paid or incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2021. This election allows eligible taxpayers to either deduct these expenditures in the year paid or incurred or elect the Code Sec. 174A(c) amortization method.

The election is made by attaching a statement entitled "FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.03 OF REV. PROC. 2025-28" to the taxpayer's original or amended federal income tax return for each applicable taxable year. The statement must include the taxpayer's identification information, declarations regarding tax shelter status and gross receipts test compliance, and specification of the chosen method.

Elections made on amended returns must be filed by July 6, 2026, subject to the normal statute of limitations under Code Sec. 6511 for refund claims.

Relief for Previously Filed Returns

Rev. Proc. 2025-28 grants automatic six-month extensions for eligible taxpayers to file superseding returns for 2024 taxable years. This relief is available to taxpayers who filed returns before September 15, 2025, without extensions, and need to make elections or method changes provided by the revenue procedure.

The extension applies to partnerships, S corporations, C corporations, individuals, trusts, estates, and exempt organizations with 2024 taxable years ending before September 15, 2025, where the original due date was before September 15, 2025.

Effective Date

Most provisions of Rev. Proc. 2025-28 are effective August 28, 2025. The modified automatic change procedures apply to Forms 3115 filed after August 28, 2025, with transition rules for taxpayers who properly filed duplicate copies before November 15, 2025.

Rev. Proc. 2025-28

The shareholders of S corporations engaged in cannabis sales could not include wages disallowed under Code Sec. 280E when calculating the Code Sec. 199A deduction. The Court reasoned that only wages "properly allocable to qualified business income" qualify, and nondeductible wages cannot be so allocated under the statute.

The shareholders of S corporations engaged in cannabis sales could not include wages disallowed under Code Sec. 280E when calculating the Code Sec. 199A deduction. The Court reasoned that only wages "properly allocable to qualified business income" qualify, and nondeductible wages cannot be so allocated under the statute.

The individuals owned three S corporations and reported pass-through income for the tax years at issue. Two corporations, engaged in cannabis sales, were subject to Code Sec. 280E, which bars deductions for expenses of businesses trafficking in controlled substances. Both entities paid significant W-2 wages, but portions were nondeductible under Code Sec. 280E. Petitioners claimed the full amount of reported wages in computing the Code Sec. 199A deduction.

The IRS reduced the deductions, asserting that only deductible wages could count as W-2 wages under Code Sec. 199A. The Court agreed, finding that Code Sec. 199A(b)(4)(B) excludes any amount not "properly allocable to qualified business income," and Code Sec. 199A(c)(3)(A)(ii) limits qualified items to those "allowed in determining taxable income." Because nondeductible wages are not allowed in determining taxable income, they cannot be W-2 wages. "Although certain amounts may have been reported by an employer to an employee in a Form W-2," the Court explained, "those amounts do not constitute "W-2 wages" for purposes of 199A if they are not properly allocated to qualified business income."

A dissenting judge argued that Congress intended the wage limitation to encourage job creation and that wages properly allocable to a trade or business should count regardless of deductibility. The majority, however, concluded that statutory text foreclosed this interpretation.

A.A. Savage, 165 TC No. 5, Dec. 62,714

A married couple was not entitled to claim a plug-in vehicle credit after the year in which their vehicle was first placed in service. 

A married couple was not entitled to claim a plug-in vehicle credit after the year in which their vehicle was first placed in service. The Tax Court explained that Code Sec. 30D provides a one-time credit available only in the year a qualified vehicle is first placed in service, meaning when it is ready and available for its intended function. The couple purchased a new plug-in electric vehicle and continued to claim the credit in later years. The IRS disallowed the credit for the tax year at issue and determined a deficiency. An accuracy-related penalty was also proposed but later conceded. Relying on regulations interpreting similar provisions under the general business credit, the Court emphasized that once the vehicle was in use in the year of purchase, it was considered placed in service. Accordingly, the Court held that the credit could not be claimed again in subsequent years.

A. Moon, 165 TC No. 4, Dec. 62,712

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has proposed regulations that would amend the Anti-Money Laundering/Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) Program and Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) Filing Requirements for registered investment advisers (IA AML Rule) by delaying the obligations of covered investment advisers from January 1, 2026, to January 1, 2028. 

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has proposed regulations that would amend the Anti-Money Laundering/Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) Program and Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) Filing Requirements for registered investment advisers (IA AML Rule) by delaying the obligations of covered investment advisers from January 1, 2026, to January 1, 2028. The proposed regulation follows an exemptive relief order issued earlier this summer (FinCEN Exemptive Relief Order, August 5, 2025).

The IA AML Rule requires covered investment advisers to establish AML/CFT programs, report suspicious activity, and keep relevant records, among other requirements.

By delaying the effective date, FinCEN states that it will have an opportunity to review the IA AML Rule, and ensure that the rule is effectively tailored to the diverse business models and risk profiles of firms in the investment adviser sector. According to FinCEN, the review may also provide an opportunity to reduce any unnecessary or duplicative regulatory burden, and ensure the IA AML Rule strikes an appropriate balance between cost and benefit, while still adequately protecting the U.S. financial system and guarding against money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit finance risks.

Request for Comments

FinCEN invites interested parties to submit comments on the proposed delay in the effective date of the IA AML Rule. Written or electronic comments must be received by October 22, 2025 (30 days after the proposed regulations are published in the Federal Register). Comments may be submitted electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal (https://www.regulations.gov), or by mail to: Policy Division, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, P.O. Box 39, Vienna, VA 22183. Refer to Docket Number FINCEN-2025-0072 and RIN 1506-AB58 and 1506-AB69.

FinCEN Proposed Rule RIN-1506-AB58 and 1506-AB69

A new, 10 percent middle-income tax cut is conditionally expected to be advanced in 2019, according to the House’s top tax writer. This timeline, although largely already expected on Capitol Hill, departs sharply from President Donald Trump’s original prediction that the measure would surface by November.

A new, 10 percent middle-income tax cut is conditionally expected to be advanced in 2019, according to the House’s top tax writer. This timeline, although largely already expected on Capitol Hill, departs sharply from President Donald Trump’s original prediction that the measure would surface by November.

Middle-Income Tax Cut

President Donald Trump announced on October 22 that a new 10 percent tax cut would soon be unveiled that will focus specifically on middle-income taxpayers. "President Trump is determined to provide further tax relief for middle-class families," House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady, R-Tex., said in an October 23 statement. "We will continue to work with the White House and Treasury over the coming weeks to develop an additional 10 percent tax cut focused specifically on middle-class families and workers, to be advanced as Republicans retain the House and Senate," Brady added.

Comment. Notably, Brady is essentially highlighting in his statement that any such additional tax cut measure would require a Republican majority for congressional approval. As November midterm elections near, there is "talk" on Capitol Hill that Republicans may lose control of the House.

The additional 10 percent tax cut for middle-income taxpayers would aim to build upon the individual tax cuts enacted last December under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97). To that end, the House passed a "Tax Reform 2.0"package last month, which would make permanent the TCJA’s individual and small business tax credits. The TCJA’s individual tax cut provisions were enacted temporarily through 2025 in accordance with certain Senate budget rules. Although the TCJA did not receive one Democratic vote, the Tax Reform 2.0 package did clear the House with some bipartisan support.

New Congress, New Tax Cut

"We expect to advance this in the new session of Congress if Republicans maintain control of the House and Senate," Brady, said of the tax cut in an October 26 televised interview. However, President Trump said a couple of days before that a " resolution" would be introduced for the tax cut by the week of October 29.

Democratic lawmakers have been criticizing Trump’s announcement as nothing more than politically-driven rhetoric ahead of the November 6 midterm elections. Several top congressional Democrats have voiced intent to repeal, at least in part, the TCJA enacted last December. While Republicans, on the other hand, want to continue building upon the TCJA’s tax cuts.

"What President Trump is looking at is a 10 percent cut focused on middle-class workers and families…he still believes middle-class families are the ones always in the squeeze," Brady said on October 26. "We’ve been working with the White House and the Treasury on some ideas about how best to do it," he added.

Net Neutral

Trump has predicted that the tax cut will be net neutral. A chief complaint of last year’s tax reform among Democrats is the TCJA estimated $1.4 trillion price tag over a 10-year budget window.

"If you speak to Brady and a group of people, we're putting in a tax reduction of 10 percent, which I think will be a net neutral because we're doing other things, which I don't have to explain now," Trump said. A spokesperson for Brady has reportedly said that cost measures for the tax cut will be addressed once the proposal has been scored.

Looking Ahead

At this time, it is considered likely on Capitol Hill that Republicans will retain control of the Senate, but several predictions continue to float that the GOP will lose its House majority. Republicans would likely need to retain control of both chambers for any chance of approving further individual tax cuts or making permanent those enacted under the TCJA.

Although, the House approved its "Tax Reform 2.0" package last month, which includes measures to make permanent the TCJA’s individual tax cuts and enhance various savings accounts and business innovation, the Senate has showed little interest in taking up the package as a whole before the end of the year. However, consideration of the retirement and savings measure in the lame-duck session remains a possibility.

The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and the American Bar Association (ABA) Section of Taxation are urging the IRS to make extensive changes to proposed "transition tax" rules.

The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and the American Bar Association (ABA) Section of Taxation are urging the IRS to make extensive changes to proposed "transition tax" rules.

Transition Tax

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97), enacted last December, revived and amended Code Sec. 965. The new Code Sec. 965 generally requires U.S. shareholders pay a mandatory one-time repatriation "transition" tax on untaxed foreign earnings of certain foreign corporations.

"The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act treats these foreign earnings as repatriated and places a 15.5 percent tax on cash or cash equivalents, and an 8 percent tax on the remaining earnings. Generally, the transition tax can be paid in installments over an eight-year period when a taxpayer files a timely election under section 965(h),"Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said in a statement.

The IRS held an October 22 public hearing on NPRM REG-104226-18, which provides rules for implementing the transition tax created under last year’s tax reform. IRS officials did not provide any feedback at the hearing.

AICPA Recommendations

In an October 31 comment letter to the IRS, the AICPA offered 15 recommendations to provide taxpayers further clarity and guidance on tax reform’s transition tax requirements. The AICPA’s recommendations include the following:

• Clarify that previously taxed earnings (PTI) under Code Sec. 965(b)(4)(A) are deemed included in Code Sec. 951 for purposes of applying Code Sec. 1248(d).
• Clarify that the portion of a Code Sec. 965 inclusion liability attributable to Code Sec. 956 is eligible for the appropriate reduced rate of tax as a consequence of the deduction provided for in Code Sec. 965(c).
• Provide taxpayers with additional flexibility when making the basis adjustment election under Proposed Reg. §1.965-2(f) by including the ability to make partial basis adjustments, elect adjustments on an entity-by-entity basis, and modify the proposed consistency provision on related persons.
• Provide guidance as to the ordering of distributions of PTI between Code Sec. 965(a) PTI and Code Sec. 965(b) PTI for purposes of applying Code Sec. 959(c) and Code Sec. 986(c).
• Provide relief to taxpayers that make or have made late elections under the proposed regulations and clarify the procedure for obtaining such relief.
• Provide that U.S. shareholders that are members of the same consolidated group are treated as a single U.S. shareholder for all purposes with respect to Code Sec. 965.
• Clarify that the PTI amount created under Code Sec. 965(b)(4)(A) is not taken into account under Code Sec. 864(e)(4)(D) for purposes of allocating and apportioning interest expense.
• Exercise the authority under Code Sec. 965(o) to provide relief from the income inclusion to certain affected taxpayers. Specifically, provide guidance excluding a foreign corporation that is considered a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) solely as a result of the "downward attribution" rules of Code Sec. 318(a)(3) from the definition of an specified foreign corporation (SFC) for any U.S. shareholder not considered a related party (within the meaning of Code Sec. 954(d)(3)) with respect to the domestic corporation to which ownership was attributed.
• Provide a carve-out for certain "triggering events" of an S corporation Code Sec. 965(i), such as where the S corporation and relevant shareholders maintain direct or indirect ownership of the transferred assets (e.g., tax-free transfers).
• Provide guidance on the interaction between a Code Sec. 962 election and a Code Sec. 965(i) election, including clarifying that an eligible taxpayer may make a Code Sec. 962 election for a Code Sec. 965 tax liability for which they intend to defer inclusion under Code Sec. 965(i).

ABA Recommendations

Likewise, the ABA made similar recommendations on the proposed regulations and related guidance in an October 29 letter sent to IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig. The ABA’s 80-page letter grouped its principal recommendations into the three categories:

• the application of Code Sec. 965 to passthrough entities (other than S corporations) and individuals;
• the application of the netting of accumulated post-1986 deferred foreign income with deficits in other related entities; and
• issues in applying the foreign tax credit.

Last year’s Tax Reform created a new 20-percent deduction of qualified business income for passthrough entities, subject to certain limitations. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97) created the new Code Sec. 199A passthrough deduction for noncorporate taxpayers, effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. However, the provision was enacted only temporarily through 2025. The controversial deduction has remained a buzzing topic of debate among lawmakers, tax policy experts, and stakeholders. In addition to its impermanence, the new passthrough deduction’s ambiguous statutory language has created many questions for taxpayers and practitioners.

Last year’s Tax Reform created a new 20-percent deduction of qualified business income for passthrough entities, subject to certain limitations. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) ( P.L. 115-97) created the new Code Sec. 199A passthrough deduction for noncorporate taxpayers, effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. However, the provision was enacted only temporarily through 2025. The controversial deduction has remained a buzzing topic of debate among lawmakers, tax policy experts, and stakeholders. In addition to its impermanence, the new passthrough deduction’s ambiguous statutory language has created many questions for taxpayers and practitioners.

The IRS released the much-anticipated proposed regulations on the new passthrough deduction, REG-107892-18, on August 8. The guidance has generated a mixed reaction on Capitol Hill, and while significant questions may have been answered, it appears that many remain. Indeed, an IRS spokesperson told Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting before the regulations were released that the IRS’s goal was to issue complete regulations but that the guidance "would not cover every question that taxpayers have."

Wolters Kluwer recently spoke with Joshua Wu, member, Clark Hill PLC, about the tax implications of the new passthrough deduction and proposed regulations. That exchange included a discussion of the impact that the new law and IRS guidance, both present and future, may have on taxpayers and tax practitioners.

I. Qualified Business Income and Activities

Wolters Kluwer: What is the effect of the proposed regulations requiring that qualified business activities meet the Code Sec. 162 trade or business standard? And for what industries might this be problematic?

Joshua Wu: The positive aspect of incorporating the Section 162 trade or business standard is that there is an established body of case law and administrative guidance with respect to what activities qualify as a trade or business. However, the test under Section 162 is factually-specific and requires an analysis of each situation. Sometimes courts reach different results with respect to activities constituting a trade or business. For example, gamblers have been denied trade or business status in numerous cases. In Groetzinger, 87-1 ustc ¶9191, 480 U.S. 23 (1987), the Court held that whether professional gambling is a trade or business depends on whether the taxpayer can show he pursued gambling full-time, in good faith, regularly and continuously, and possessed a sincere profit motive. Some courts have held that the gambling activity must be full-time, from 60 to 80 hours per week, while others have questioned whether the full-time inquiry is a mandatory prerequisite or permissive factor to determine whether the taxpayer’s gambling activity is a trade or business. See e.g., Tschetschot , 93 TCM 914, Dec. 56,840(M)(2007). Although Section 162 provides a built-in body of law, plenty of questions remain.

Aside from the gambling industry, the real estate industry will continue to face some uncertainty over what constitutes a trade or business under Code Secs. 162 and 199A. The proposed regulations provide a helpful rule, where the rental or licensing of tangible or intangible property to a related trade or business is treated as a trade or business if the rental or licensing and the other trade or business are commonly controlled. But, that rule does not help taxpayers in the rental industry with no ties to another trade or business. The question remains whether a taxpayer renting out a single-family home or a small group of apartments is engaged in a trade or business for purposes of Code Secs. 162 and 199A. Some case law indicates that just receiving rent with nothing more may not constitute a trade or business. On the other hand, numerous cases have found that managing property and collecting rent can constitute a trade or business. Given the potential tax savings at issue, I suspect there will be additional cases in the real estate industry regarding the level of activity required for the leasing of property to be considered a trade or business.

Qualified Business Income

Wolters Kluwer: How does the IRS define qualified business income (QBI)?

Joshua Wu: QBI is the net amount of effectively connected qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss from any qualified trade or business. Certain items are excluded from QBI, such as capital gains/losses, certain dividends, and interest income. Proposed Reg. §1.199A-3(b) provides further clarity on QBI. Most importantly, they provide that a passthrough with multiple trades or businesses must allocate items of QBI to such trades or businesses based on a reasonable and consistent method that clearly reflects income and expenses. The passthrough may use a different reasonable method for different items of income, gain, deduction, and loss, but the overall combination of methods must also be reasonable based on all facts and circumstances. Further, the books and records must be consistent with allocations under the method chosen. The proposed regulations provide no specific guidance or examples of what a reasonable allocation looks like. Thus, taxpayers are left to determine what constitutes a reasonable allocation.

Unadjusted Basis Immediately after Acquisition

Wolters Kluwer: What effect does the unadjusted basis immediately after acquisition (UBIA) of qualified property attributable to a trade or business have on determining QBI?

Joshua Wu: For taxpayers above the taxable income threshold amounts, $157,500 (single or married filing separate) or $315,000 (married filing jointly), the Code limits the taxpayer’s 199A deduction based on (i) the amount of W-2 wages paid with respect to the trade or business, and/or (ii) the unadjusted basis immediately after acquisition (UBIA) of qualified property held for use in the trade or business.

Where a business pays little or no wages, and the taxpayer is above the income thresholds, the best way to maximize the deduction is to look to the UBIA of qualified property. Rather than the 50 percent of W-2 wages limitation, Section 199A provides an alternative limit based on 25 percent of W-2 wages and 2.5 percent of UBIA qualified property. The Code and proposed regulations define UBIA qualified property as tangible, depreciable property which is held by and available for use in the qualified trade or business at the close of the tax year, which is used at any point during the tax year in the production of qualified business income, and the depreciable period for which has not ended before the close of the tax year. The proposed regulations helpfully clarify that UBIA is not reduced for taxpayers who take advantage of the expanded bonus depreciation allowance or any Section 179expensing.

De Minimis Exception

Wolters Kluwer: How is the specified service trade or business (SSTB) limitation clarified under the proposed regulations? And how does the de minimis exception apply?

Joshua Wu: The proposed regulations provide helpful guidance on the definition of a SSTB and avoid what some practitioners feared would be an expansive and amorphous area of section 199A. Under the statute, if a trade or business is an SSTB, its items are not taken into account for the 199A computation. Thus, the performance of services in the fields of health, law, accounting, actuarial science, performing arts, consulting, athletics, financial and brokerage services, investment management, trading, dealing in securities, and any trade or business where the principal asset of such is the reputation or skill of one or more of its employees or owners, do not result in a 199A deduction.

There is a de minimis exception to the general rule for taxpayers with taxable income of less than $157,500 (single or married filing separate) or $315,000 (married filing jointly). Once those thresholds are hit, the 199A deduction phases-out until it is fully eliminated at $207,500 (single) or $415,000 (joint).

The proposed regulations provide guidance for each of the SSTB fields. Importantly, they also limit the "reputation or skill" category. The proposed regulations state that the "reputation or skill" clause was intended to describe a "narrow set of trades or businesses, not otherwise covered by the enumerated specified services." Thus, the proposed regulations limit this definition to cases where the business receives income from endorsing products or services, licensing or receiving income for use of an individual’s image, likeness, name, signature, voice, trademark, etc., or receiving appearance fees. This narrow definition is unlikely to impact most taxpayers.